banner



What Does The Clock Drawing Test Measure

Purpose


The CDT is used to quickly assess visuospatial and praxis abilities, and may decide the presence of both attention and executive dysfunctions (Adunsky, Fleissig, Levenkrohn, Arad, & Nov, 2002; Suhr, Grace, Allen, Nadler, & McKenna, 1998; McDowell, & Newell, 1996).

The CDT may be used in addition to other quick screening tests such every bit the Mini-Mental Country Test (MMSE), and the Functional Independence Mensurate (FIM).

In-Depth Review

Purpose of the mensurate

The CDT is used to quickly assess visuospatial and praxis abilities, and may determine the presence of both attention and executive dysfunctions (Adunsky, Fleissig, Levenkrohn, Arad, & Nov, 2002; Suhr, Grace, Allen, Nadler, & McKenna, 1998; McDowell & Newell, 1996).

The CDT may be used in addition to other quick screening tests such equally the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM).

Available versions

The CDT is a simple task completion exam in its virtually basic form. There are several variations to the CDT:

Verbal command:

  • Costless drawn clock:
    The individual is given a bare sheet of newspaper and asked starting time to describe the face of a clock, place the numbers on the clock, and so draw the easily to indicate a given time. To successfully complete this task, the patient must kickoff draw the contour of the clock, then place the numbers 1 through 12 inside, and finally indicate the correct time by drawing in the easily of the clock.
  • Pre-fatigued clock:
    Alternatively, some clinicians prefer to provide the individual with a pre-fatigued circumvolve and the patient is just required to place the numbers and the hands on the face of the clock. They argue that the patient's power to fill in the numbers may be adversely afflicted if the contour is poorly drawn. In this task, if an private draws a completely normal clock, information technology is a fast indication that a number of functions are intact. However, a markedly abnormal clock is an of import indication that the individual may have a cerebral deficit, warranting farther investigation.

Regardless of which type is used (free drawn or pre-fatigued), the verbal command CDT can simultaneously appraise a patient's linguistic communication function (verbal comprehension); memory part (retrieve of a visual engram, short-term storage, and call up of fourth dimension setting instructions); and executive function. The verbal command variation of the CDT is highly sensitive for temporal lobe dysfunction (due to its heavy involvement in both memory and linguistic communication processes) and frontal lobe dysfunction (due to its mediation of executive planning ) (Shah, 2002).

Copy command:

The individual is given a fully drawn clock with a certain time pre-marked and is asked to replicate the drawing equally closely as possible. The successful completion of the re-create command requires less utilize of language and retentivity functions but requires greater reliance on visuospatial and perceptual processes.

Copy command clock

Clock reading test:
A modified version of the re-create command CDT simply asks the patient to read aloud the indicated time on a clock drawn by the examiner. The re-create command clock-drawing and clock reading tests are good for assessing parietal lobe lesions such every bit those that may result in hemineglect. It is important to do both the verbal control and the copy command tests for every patient as a patient with a temporal lobe lesion may copy a pre-fatigued clock adequately, whereas their clock drawn to exact command may show poor number spacing and incorrect time setting. Conversely, a patient with a parietal lobe lesion may draw an adequate clock to verbal command, while their clock drawing with the copy command may bear witness obvious signs of neglect.

Clock reading clock

Time-Setting Instructions:

The most common setting chosen by clinicians is "3 O'clock" (Freedman, Leach, Kaplan, Winocur, Shulman, & Delis, 1994). Although this setting fairly assesses comprehension and motor execution, it does not indicate the presence of whatsoever left neglect the patient may have because information technology does not require the left half of the clock to be used at all. The fourth dimension setting "10 after xi" is an platonic setting (Kaplan, 1988). It forces the patient to attend to the whole clock and requires the recoding of the control "10" to the number "two" on the clock. It besides has the added advantage of uncovering any stimulus-bound errors that the patient may brand. For instance, the presence of the number "10" on the clock may trap some patients and forestall the recoding of the command "x" into the number "two." Instead of drawing the minute hand towards the number "2" on the clock to signal "ten after," patients prone to stimulus-jump errors volition fixate and draw the infinitesimal paw toward the number "10" on the clock.

Features of the measure

Scoring:

There are a number of dissimilar ways to score the CDT. In full general, the scores are used to evaluate whatsoever errors or distortions such as neglecting to include numbers, putting numbers in the wrong identify, or having wrong spacing (McDowell & Newell, 1996). Scoring systems may be elementary or circuitous, quantitative or qualitative in nature. Equally a quick preliminary screening tool to simply detect the presence or absence of cerebral damage, you may wish to use a simple quantitative method (Lorentz et al., 2002). Still, if a more complex assessment is required, a qualitative scoring arrangement would exist more than telling.

Dissimilar scoring methods take been plant to be better suited for unlike subject groups (Richardson & Glass, 2002; Heinrik, Solomesh, & Berkman, 2004). In patients with stroke , no single standardized method of scoring exists. Suhr, Grace, Allen, Nadler, and McKenna (1998) examined the utility of the CDT in localizing lesions in 76 patients with stroke and 71 controls. Six scoring systems were used to appraise clock drawings (Freedman et al., 1994; Ishiai, Sugishita, Ichikawa, Gono, & Watabiki, 1993; Mendez, Ala, & Underwood, 1992; Rouleau, Salmon, Butters, Kennedy, & McGuire, 1992; Sunderland et al., 1989; Tuokko, Hadjistavropoulos, Miller, & Beattie, 1992; Watson, Arfken, & Birge, 1993; Wolf-Klein et al., 1989). Pregnant differences were found between controls and patients with stroke on all scoring systems for both quantitative and qualitative features of the CDT. Withal, quantitative indices were not helpful in differentiating betwixt diverse stroke groups (left versus right versus bilateral stroke ; cortical versus subcortical stroke ; anterior versus posterior stroke ). Qualitative features were helpful in lateralizing lesion site and differentiating subcortical from cortical groups.

A psychometric study in patients with stroke past Southward, Greve, Bianchini, and Adams (2001) compared 3 scoring systems: the Rouleau rating scale (1992); the Freedman scoring system (1994), and the Libon revised organisation (1993). These scoring systems were found to be reliable in patients with stroke (delight see for the details of this study).

Subscales:

None typically reported.

Equipment:

Only a newspaper and pencil is required. Depending on the method called, yous may need to gear up a circumvolve (about 10 cm in diameter) on the paper for the patient.

Training:

The CDT can be administered past individuals with trivial or no training in cerebral assessment. Scanlan, Brush, Quijano, & Borson (2002) plant that a simple binary rating of clock drawings (normal or abnormal) past untrained raters was surprisingly effective in classifying subjects every bit having dementia or not. In this report, a common fault of untrained scorers was failure to recognize incorrect spacing of numbers on the clock face up as aberrant. By directing at this type of error, cyclopedia between untrained and expert raters should improve.

Time:

All variations of the CDT should take approximately 1-2 minutes to consummate (Ruchinskas & Curyto, 2003).

Culling forms of the CDT

The Clock Cartoon Test-Modified and Integrated Arroyo (CDT-MIA) is a four-step, xx-item instrument, with a maximum score of 33. The CDT-MIA emphasizes differential scoring of contour, numbers, hands, and center. It integrates 3 existing CDT's:

  • Freedman et al'southward free-fatigued clock (1994) on some item definitions
  • Scoring techniques adapted from Paganini-Hill, Clark, Henderson, & Birge (2001)
  • Some items borrowed from Royall, Cordes, & Polk (1998) executive CLOX

The CDT-MIA was found to be reliable and valid in individuals with dementia, yet this mensurate has not been validated in the stroke population (Heinik et al., 2004).

Client suitability

Can be used as a screening instrument with:

Virtually any patient population (Wagner, Nayak, & Fink, 1995). The examination appears to exist differentially sensitive to some types of affliction processes. Particularly, it has proven to be clinically useful in differentiating amid normal elderly, patients with neurodegenerative or vascular diseases, and those with psychiatric disorders, such as depression and schizophrenia (Dastoor, Schwartz, & Kurzman, 1991; Heinik, Vainer-Benaiah, Lahav, & Drummer, 1997; Lee & Lawlor, 1995; Shulman, Golden, & Cohen, 1993; Spreen & Strauss, 1991; Tracy, De Leon, Doonan, Musciente, Ballas, & Josiassen, 1996; Wagner et al., 1995; Wolf-Klein, Silverstone, Levy, & Brod, 1989).

Can be used with:

  • Patients with stroke . Considering the CDT requires a nonverbal response, it may be administered to those with speech difficulties but who have sufficient comprehension to empathise the requirement of the task.

Should non be used in:

  • Patients who cannot sympathise spoken or written instructions
  • Patients who cannot write

As with many other neuropsychological screening measures, the CDT is affected by historic period, education, conditions such as visual fail and hemiparesis, and other factors such as the presence of low (Ruchinskas & Curyto, 2003; Lorentz, Scanlan, & Borson, 2002). The degree to which these factors affect ones score depends much on the scoring method applied (McDowell & Newell, 1996). Moreover, the CDT focuses on correct hemisphere role, and so it is important to utilise this test in conjunction with other neuropsychological tests (McDowell & Newell, 1996).

In what languages is the measure out available?

The CDT can exist conducted in whatever linguistic communication. Borson et al. (1999) institute that language spoken did not have whatsoever direct effect on CDT exam performance.

Summary

What does the tool measure? Visuospatial and praxis abilities, and may determine the presence of both attention and executive dysfunctions.
What types of clients tin can the tool be used for? Most any patient population. It has proven to be clinically useful in differentiating amongst normal elderly, patients with neurodegenerative or vascular diseases, and those with psychiatric disorders, such equally low and schizophrenia.
Is this a screening or cess tool? Screening
Fourth dimension to administrate All variations of the CDT should accept approximately one-ii minutes to complete.
Versions
  • Verbal command: Free fatigued clock; Pre-drawn clock;
  • Copy control: Copy command; Clock reading test
  • Fourth dimension-setting: "10 after 11"
  • The Clock Drawing Examination Modified and Integrated Approach (CDT-MIA)
Languages The CDT can be conducted in whatsoever language.
Measurement Properties
Reliability Test-retest:
Out of 4 studies examining exam-retest reliability , three reported fantabulous test-retest and one found adequate exam-retest.
Inter-rater:
Out of seven studies examining inter-rater reliability , half dozen reported excellent inter-rater and 1 reported adequate (for examiner clocks) to splendid (for free-drawn and pre-drawn clocks inter-rater.
Validity Criterion:
Predicted lower functional ability and increased need for supervision on hospital belch; poor physical power and longer length of stay in geriatric rehabilitation; activities of daily living at maximal recovery.
Construct:
The CDT correlated fairly with the Mini-Mental State Exam and the Functional Independence Mensurate.
Known groups:
Significant differences betwixt Alzheimer's patients and controls detected by CDT.
Does the tool observe change in patients? Not applicable
Acceptability The CDT is short and uncomplicated. Information technology is a nonverbal task and may be less threatening to patients than responding to a series of questions.
Feasibility The CDT is inexpensive and highly portable. It can be administered in situations in which longer tests would be impossible or inconvenient. Even the nearly complex administration and scoring organisation requires approximately 2 minutes. It tin be administered by individuals with minimal training in cognitive assessment.
How to obtain the tool? A pre-drawn circle tin can be downloaded past clicking on this link: pre-drawn circumvolve

Psychometric Backdrop

Overview

Until recently, data on the psychometric backdrop of the CDT were limited. While there are many possible means to administer and score the CDT, the psychometric backdrop of all the various systems seem consistent and all forms correlate strongly with other cognitive measures (Scanlan et al., 2002; Ruchinskas & Curyto, 2003; McDowell & Newell, 1996). Further, scoring of the CDT has been plant to be both accurate and consequent in patients with stroke (South et al., 2001).

For the purposes of this review, we conducted a literature search to identify all relevant publications on the psychometric properties of the more commonly practical scoring methods of the CDT. We then selected to review manufactures from loftier impact journals, and from a variety of authors.

Reliability

Test-retest:

Using Spearman rank social club correlations of the CDT has been reported by several investigators using a diversity of scoring systems:

  • Manos and Wu (1994) reported an "excellent" two-day exam-retest reliability of 0.87 for medical patients and 0.94 for surgical patients.
  • Tuokko et al. (1992) reported an "adequate" test-retest reliability of 0.70 at iv days.
  • Mendez et al. (1992) reported and "excellent" coefficients of 0.78 and 0.76 at iii and 6 months, respectively.
  • Freedman et al. (1994) reported test-retest reliability as "very depression". All the same, when the "x after xi" time setting was used with the examiner clock, which is known to be a more than sensitive setting for detecting cognitive dysfunction, test-retest reliability was found to exist "excellent" (0.94).

Inter-rater:

Inter-rater reliability of the CDT, equally indicated by Spearman rank order correlations (non the preferred method of analyses for assessing inter-rater reliability but i used in earlier measurement research), has besides been reported by several investigators:

  • Sunderland et al. (1989) found "excellent" coefficients ranging from 0.86 to 0.97 and institute no difference between clinician and non-clinician raters (0.84 and 0.86, respectively).
  • Rouleau et al. (1992) found "fantabulous" inter-rater reliability , with coefficients ranging from 0.92 to 0.97.
  • Mendez et al. (1992) reported "fantabulous" inter-rater reliability of 0.94.
  • Tuokko et al. (1992) reported loftier coefficients ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 across iii annual assessments.
  • The modified Shulman scale (Shulman, Gold, Cohen, & Zucchero, 1993) besides has "excellent" inter-rater reliability (0.94 at baseline, 0.97 at 6 months, and 0.97 at 12 months).
  • Manos and Wu (1994) obtained "excellent" inter-rater reliability coefficients ranging from 0.88 to 0.96.
  • Freedman et al. (1994) reported coefficients ranging from 0.79 to 0.99 on the complimentary-fatigued clocks, 0.84 to 0.85 using the pre-drawn contours, and 0.63 to 0.74 for the examiner clocks, demonstrating "excellent" inter-rater reliability .

South et al. (2001) compared the psychometrics of 3 dissimilar scoring methods of the CDT (Libon revised system; Rouleau rating scale; and Freedman scoring system) in a sample of 20 patients with stroke . Intra-rater reliability were measured using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) . Raters used comparable criteria for each score demonstrating "excellent" inter-rater reliability . Raters used like scoring criteria throughout, demonstrating "excellent" intra-rater reliability . South et al. (2001) concluded that while the Libon scoring system demonstrated a range of reliabilities beyond different domains, the Rouleau and Freedman systems were in the excellent range.

Validity

In a review, Shulman (2000) reported that nearly studies achieved sensitivities and specificities of approximately 85% and concluded that the CDT, in conjunction with other widely used tests such as the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), could provide a meaning advance in the early detection of dementia. In contrast, Powlishta et al. (2002) concluded from their report that the CDT did not appear to be a useful screening tool for detecting very mild dementia. Other authors have concluded that the CDT should non be used alone every bit a dementia screening test because of its overall inadequate performance (Borson & Brush, 2002; Storey et al., 2001). Yet, nigh of the previous studies were based on relatively small sample sizes or were undertaken in a clinical setting, and their results may not be applicable to a larger community population.

Nishiwaki et al. (2004) studied the validity of the CDT in comparison to the MMSE in a large full general elderly population (aged 75 years or older). The specificity of the CDT for detecting moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment (MMSE score = 17) were 77% and 87%, respectively, for nurse administration and twoscore% and 91%, respectively, for postal administration. The authors conclude that the CDT may take value as a brief face-to-face screening tool for moderate/severe cognitive impairment in an older community population but is relatively poor at detecting milder cerebral impairment.

Few studies have examined the validity of the CDT specifically in patients with stroke . Adunsky et al. (2002) compared the CDT with the MMSE and cognitive Functional Independence Measure out (FIM) (cerebral tests used for the evaluation of functional outcomes at discharge in elderly patients with stroke ). The tests were administered to 151 patients admitted for inpatient rehabilitation following an acute stroke . Correlation coefficients (Pearson correlation ) between the three cognitive tests resulted in r-values ranging from 0.51 to 0.59. Adunsky et al. (2002) ended that they share a reasonable caste of resemblance to each other, bookkeeping for "adequate" concurrent validity of these tests.

Bailey, Riddoch, and Crome (2000) evaluated a test battery for hemineglect in elderly patients with stroke and determined that the CDT had questionable validity in the assessment of representational neglect. Further, consistent with previous findings (Ishiai et al., 1993; Kaplan et al., 1991), the utility of the CDT as a screening measure out for fail was not supported from these results. Reasons include the subjectivity in scoring, and questionable validity in that the task may too reflect cognitive harm (Freidman, 1991), constructional apraxia, or impaired planning ability (Kinsella, Packer, Ng, Olver, & Stark, 1995).

Responsiveness

Not applicable.

References

  • Adunsky, A., Fleissig, Y., Levenkrohn, S., Arad, Thousand., Nov, Due south.(2002). Clock drawing job, mini-mental state test and cognitive-functional independence measure out: relation to functional event of stroke patients. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 35(2), 153-lx.
  • Bailey, Grand. J., Riddoch, J., Crome, P. (2002). Evaluation ofa test battery for hemineglect in elderly stroke patients for use by therapists in clinical do. Neurorehabilitation, fourteen(three), 139-150.
  • Borson, Due south., Castor, Grand., Gil, E., Scanlan, J., Vitaliano, P.,Chen, J., Cahsman, J., Sta Maria, M. M., Barnhart, R., Roques, J. (1999). The Clock Drawing Examination: Utility for dementia detection in multiethnic elders. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 54, M534-40.
  • Dastoor, D. P., Schwartz, G., Kurzman, D. (1991).Clock-drawing: An cess technique in dementia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Gerontology, 13, 69-85.
  • Freedman, M., Leach, L., Kaplan, E., Winocur, G., Shulman,M. I., Delis, D. C. (1994). Clock Drawing: A Neuropsychological Analysis (pp. 5). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Friedman, P. J. (1991). Clock drawing in acute stroke.Age and Ageing, twenty(2), 140-145.
  • Heinik, J., Vainer-Benaiah, Z., Lahav, D., Drummer, D.(1997). Clock drawing examination in elderly schizophrenia patients. International Periodical of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12, 653-655.
  • Heinik, J., Solomesh, I., Berkman, P. (2004). Correlationbetween the CAMCOG, the MMSE and three clock drawing tests in a specialized outpatient psychogeriatric service. Arch Gerontol Geriatr, 38, 77-84.
  • Heinik, J., Solomesh, I., Lin, R., Raikher, B., Goldray, D.,Merdler, C., Kemelman, P. (2004). Clock cartoon test-modified and integrated approach (CDT-MIA): Description and preliminary examination of its validity and reliability in dementia patients referred to a specialized psychogeriatric setting. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol, 17, 73-fourscore.
  • Ishiai, S., Sugishita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gono, S., Watabiki,Southward. (1993). Clock drawing test and unilateral spatial neglect. Neurology, 43, 106-110.
  • Kaplan, E. (1988). A procedure approach to neuropsychologicalassessment. In: T Bull & BK Bryant (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology and brain function: Research, measurement, and practice (pp. 129-167). Washington DC: American Psychological Clan.
  • Kaplan, R.F., Verfaillie, M., Meadows, M., Caplan, L.R.,Pessin, G. South., DeWitt 50. (1991). Changing attentional demands in left hemispatial neglect. Archives of Neurology, 48, 1263-1267.
  • Kinsella, G., Packer, S., Ng, K., Olver, J., Stark, R.(1995). Continuing issues in the cess of fail. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 5, 239-258.
  • Lee, H., Lawlor, B. A. (1995). Country-dependent nature of theClock Drawing Task in geriatric depression. Journal of the American Geriatrics Club, 43, 796-798.
  • Lorentz, W. J., Scanlan, J. Thousand., Borson, S. (2002). Briefscreening tests for dementia. Can J Psychiatry, 47, 723-733.
  • Manos, P. J., Wu, R. (1994). The X Betoken Clock Test: Aquick screen and grading organisation for cerebral impairment in medical and surgical patients. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 24, 229-244.
  • McDowell, I., Newell, C. (1996). Measuring Health. A Guideto Rating Scales and Questionnaires. 2nd ed. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
  • Mendez, M. F., Ala, T., Underwood, K. L. (1992). Developmentof scoring criteria for the clock drawing task in Alzheimers disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, xl, 1095-1099.
  • Nishiwaki, Y., Breeze, Due east., Smeeth, L., Bulpitt, C. J.,Peters, R., Fletcher, A. E. (2004). Validity of the Clock-Cartoon Test as a Screening Tool for Cognitive Harm in the Elderly. American Journal of Epidemiology, 160(8), 797-807.
  • Paganini-Hill, A., Clark, Fifty. J., Henderson, 5. Due west., Birge, S.J. (2001). Clock drawing: Analysis in a retirement customs. J Am Geriatr Soc, 49, 941-947.
  • Powlishta, Thou. Thou., von Dras, D. D., Stanford, A., Carr D. B.,Tsering, C., Miller, J. P., Morris, J. C. (2002). The Clock Cartoon Test is a poor screen for very balmy dementia. Neurology, 59, 898-903.
  • Richardson, H. E., Glass, J.N. (2002). A comparison ofscoring protocols on the clock drawing examination in relation to ease of utilize, diagnostic group and correlations with mini-mental state test. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 50, 169-173.
  • Rouleau, I., Salmon, D. P., Butters, N., Kennedy, C.,McGuire, Thou. (1992). Quantitative and qualitative analyses of clock drawings in Alzheimers and Huntington'due south. Encephalon and Cognition, 18, 70-87.
  • Royall, D. R., Cordes, J. A., Polk, Thousand. (1998). CLOX: anexecutive clock cartoon task. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 64, 588-594.
  • Ruchinskas, R. A., Curyto, K. J. (2003). Cognitive screeningin geriatric rehabilitation. Rehabil Psychol, 48, xiv-22.
  • Scanlan, J. M., Brush, M., Quijano, C., Borson, S. (2002).Comparing clock tests for dementia screening: naïve judgments vs formal systems – what is optimal? International Periodical of Geriatric Psychiatry, 17(1), 14-21.
  • Shah, J. (2001). Simply time volition tell: Clock drawing as anearly indicator of neurological dysfunction. P&S Medical Review, 7(2), thirty-34.
  • Shulman, Thou. I., Golden, D. P., Cohen, C. A., Zucchero, C. A.(1993). Clock-cartoon and dementia in the community: A longitudinal written report. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 8(6), 487-496.
  • Shulman, Yard. I. (2000). Clock-cartoon: Is it the idealcognitive screening exam? International Periodical of Geriatric Psychiatry, 15, 548-561.
  • Shulman, K., Shedletsky, R., Silver, I. (1986). Thechallenge of time: Clock-drawing and cognitive function in the elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, i, 135-140.
  • South, Thousand. B., Greve, 1000. Due west., Bianchini, Yard. J., Adams, D.(2001). Inter-rater reliability of Three Clock Cartoon Examination scoring systems. Applied Neuropsychology, 8(3), 174-179.
  • Spreen, O., Strauss, E. A. (1991). Compendium ofneuropsychological tests: Administration, norms, and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Storey, J. East., Rowland, J. T., Bones, D., Conforti, D. A.(2001). A comparison of five clock scoring methods using ROC (receiver operating characteristic) bend assay. Int J Geriatr Psychiatr, sixteen, 394-9.
  • Sunderland, T., Loma, J. L., Mellow, A. 1000., Lowlor, B. A.,Grundersheimer, J., Newhouse, P. A., Grafman, J. H. (1989). Clock drawing in Alzheimer's disease: a novel measure of dementia severity. J Am Geriatr Soc, 37(viii), 725-729.
  • Suhr, J., Grace, J., Allen, J., Nadler, J., McKenna, Yard.(1998). Quantitative and Qualitative Performance of Stroke Versus Normal Elderly on Six Clock Drawing Systems. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 13(6), 495-502.
  • Tracy, J. I., De Leon, J., Doonan, R., Musciente, J.,Ballas, T., Josiassen, R. C. (1996). Clock drawing in schizophrenia. Psychological Reports, 79, 923-928.
  • Tuokko, H., Hadjistavropoulos, T., Miller, J. A., Beattie,B. Fifty. (1992). The Clock Examination, a sensitive measure to differentiate normal elderly from those with Alzheimer disease. Periodical of the American Geriatrics Society, 40, 579-584.
  • Wagner, Thousand. T., Nayak, Grand., Fink, C. (1995). Bedside screeningof neurocognitive office. In: L. A. Cushman & M. J. Scherer (Eds.), Psychological assessment in medical rehabilitation: Measurement and instrumentation in psychology (pp. 145-198). Washington, DC: American Psychological Clan.
  • Watson, Y. I., Arfken, C. L., Birge, Southward. J. (1993). Clockcompletion : An objective screening test for dimentia. J Am Geriar Soc, 41(xi), 1235-forty.
  • Wolf-Klein, One thousand. P., Silverstone, F. A., Levy, A. P., Brod, K.Southward. (1989). Screening for Alzheimer'southward disease by clock cartoon.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 37, 730-734.

Come across the measure

Click here to notice a pre-drawn circumvolve that can be used when administering the CDT.

Source: https://strokengine.ca/en/assessments/clock-drawing-test-cdt/

Posted by: mcdonnellturper.blogspot.com

0 Response to "What Does The Clock Drawing Test Measure"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel